This informational discrepancy is only apparent. The point is that phytochemicals are a general term encompassing tens of thousands of different substances, each influencing metabolism and health in its own way. Some are directly toxic, others have "only" antinutritional effects, while others benefit health. Therefore, it is not possible to generalize their effects as a group. Each plant food contains a different spectrum of phytochemical substances. Based on their proven effect and content, it then makes sense to determine whether they are suitable for a particular individual.
If you are focusing on supplements, it makes sense to pay attention to those containing standardized amounts of phytoestrogens. In the given configuration, long-term use can indeed influence hormonal regulation, with small children being the most sensitive. Doses at the level commonly recommended for supplementation should not shift the balance in an undesirable direction in adults. Moreover, in the male population, these products are often beneficial for suppressing the side effects of testosterone. Problems always arise from excess; it is important to adhere to reasonable standards in dosage and not overdo it (despite the fact that these are supplements and not medications).
This is a good question that is constantly being discussed. Essentially, the whole problem began with the publication of studies pointing out the fact that increased intake of isolated phytoestrogens from soy (in laboratory conditions) led to a higher incidence of certain cancers. This information, in itself, may not be significant because it represents an unnatural situation (experiments on rodents + enormously high doses of isolated substances not achievable through normal diet). In practice, when attempting to prove this effect, interesting correlations were found:
1. The Asian population, where soy products are a regular part of the daily diet, shows an average intake of soy isoflavones around 50 mg per day (equivalent to approximately 250 g of tofu). The incidence of certain cancers (primarily breast cancer), along with other diseases where the positive effects of phytoestrogens are proven, is significantly lower compared to the Western population.
2. The European and American populations show a long-term average daily intake of phytoestrogens around 3 mg, corresponding to the increased incidence of the aforementioned diseases at these substantially lower doses.
3. Phytoestrogens function by having the ability to bind to the estrogen receptor on the cell nucleus membrane. However, this does not increase estrogenic activity to the extent commonly presented because the biological effect of dietary isoflavones is approximately one-thousandth the activity of our own estrogen. This means that under normal conditions, the intake of phytoestrogens from a regular diet is safe (= does not negatively affect hormonal regulation).
4. Problems arise in situations where, instead of a natural diet (soybeans, or whole grains of any legumes, not just soy, or basic derivatives like tempeh or tofu), we incorporate specifically processed soy foods into the diet, resulting in much higher concentrations of phytoestrogens. Typical examples can be soy protein concentrates or soy meat and products made from it. This extreme can also be reached by consuming an enormously high amount of soybeans or their "healthy" derivatives (tofu, tempeh), which can happen in practice as many people tend to follow various dietary trends.
And be careful here—the pro-estrogenic effect of dietary phytoestrogens counters or surpasses the influence of self-produced estrogen, especially in situations where the production of one's own estrogen is significantly lower, which most often occurs in menopausal women. Based on this finding, misinformation spreads that soy is a dangerous food concerning its impact on hormonal regulation, while in reality, it only pertains to very specific situations.
In summary, if you consume basic soy products (= avoiding concentrated sources of phytoestrogens, including dietary supplements) and in quantities that fundamentally adhere to the principles of a diverse and varied diet (= regardless of attempts to quantify exact amounts and seek non-existent boundaries of what is still okay and what is too much), there is no need to worry unnecessarily about the negative impact of phytoestrogens on health. On the contrary, studies highlight the strongly beneficial effects of soy phytoestrogens for both men and women, as they regulate estrogenic activity (for example, their effect on increasing bone density is noteworthy).
The amounts of food you mention are absolutely normal for all population groups; just be cautious of increased intake of protein concentrates.
Questions answered by
Mgr. Martin Jelinek
Lecturer and author of the educational system
Nutrition educator, lecturer, and author of the educational system and the ZOF learning application.
Mgr. Martin Jelínek has been systematically involved in nutrition education since 1999. He is the founder of ATAC, the educational company behind NutriCourses, and the author of an educational system focused on nutrition, healthy lifestyle, and the practical application of nutrition knowledge.
He graduated from the Faculty of Science at Masaryk University in Brno. Throughout his professional career, he has combined nutrition, education, and the practical application of acquired knowledge. His educational system also includes the ZOF (Zone of Optimal Functioning) learning application, where students turn theory into practical work with meal plans.
In 2007, he launched the first intake of a six-month course focused on the education of nutrition advisors. Over time, this course became the foundation for the further development of the educational system and a range of specialised courses.